2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Land Rover | Lotus |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Elan |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 45 L |