2009 Lincoln Navigator vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Lincoln Navigator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Lincoln Navigator would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 827 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.
Because 2009 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (3,200 Nm) has 2705 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lincoln Navigator. (495 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lincoln Navigator.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lincoln Navigator | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Navigator | S60 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 3200 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 127 L | 67 L |