2009 Mazda 3 vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1979 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 3 | 1979 Seat 131 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 3 | 131 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2500 mm |