2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1966 Moretti 2500
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Moretti 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Moretti 2500 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Moretti 2500. (143 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Moretti 2500.
Because 1966 Moretti 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Moretti 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Moretti 2500 (187 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Moretti 2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1966 Moretti 2500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Moretti |
| Model | 6 | 2500 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2487 cc | 2454 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
