2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1977 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (182 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1977 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1977 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 6 | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2183 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |