2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1984 Holden Astra
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Astra would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (272 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1984 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1984 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (365 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1984 Holden Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 6 | Astra |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3725 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 272 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2420 mm |