2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 1964 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 225 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute.
Because 1964 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda Tribute | 1964 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | Tribute | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2930 mm |
