2009 Mitsubishi Raider vs. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider (210 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mitsubishi Raider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | 2011 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Daewoo |
| Model | Raider | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
