2009 Volvo C70 vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S40 would be higher. Both 2009 Volvo C70 and 2004 Volvo S40 are equipped with a 2,521 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S40. (218 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo C70 | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | C70 | S40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |