2009 Volvo S40 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Volvo C70. (206 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 226 kg more than 2009 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (285 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Volvo S40 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Volvo | Volvo |
| Model | S40 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2521 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8 seconds | 9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1339 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 16.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
