2010 Cadillac DTS vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 998 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Cadillac DTS | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DTS | 66 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5273 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1463 mm | 1390 mm |
