2010 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 134 kg more than 2012 Fisker Karma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Cadillac Escalade | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fisker |
| Model | Escalade | Karma |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 332 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2674 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5144 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2007 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1928 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2946 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 36 L |
