2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Honda Integra
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda Integra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2003 Honda Integra. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Integra.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Camaro | Integra |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 304 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4836 mm | 4374 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1918 mm | 1725 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1377 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2852 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |
