2010 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2011 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Chevrolet HHR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Chevrolet HHR would be higher. Both 2010 Chevrolet HHR and 2011 Chevrolet HHR are equipped with a 2,200 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 155 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 203 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Chevrolet HHR | 2011 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | HHR | HHR |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1431 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4475 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1603 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2629 mm | 2629 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 61 L |