2010 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Chrysler 300 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 212 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chrysler 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chrysler | Mini |
Model | 300 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4999 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1882 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3048 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 47 L |