2010 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (296 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (441 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C-Crosser | S60 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2179 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 296 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
