2010 Ford Expedition vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2003 Ford Windstar. (200 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Windstar.
Because 2010 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford Expedition | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Expedition | Windstar |
Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5621 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2002 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1974 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3327 mm | 3066 mm |