2010 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford F-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford F-250 | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | F-250 | TT |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 494 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Vehicle Length | 6253 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1961 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 60 L |
