2010 Ford Fusion vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Fusion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Fusion would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 663 kg more than 2010 Ford Fusion.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Fusion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ford Fusion | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fusion | Tundra |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | CVT | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4841 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1834 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1445 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2728 mm | 3700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.7 L/100km | 16.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 100 L |