2010 Ford Mustang vs. 1979 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 783 kg more than 1979 Toyota Tercel.
Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Toyota Tercel has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Toyota Tercel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Ford Mustang | 1979 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Mustang | Tercel |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1603 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4778 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1425 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2510 mm |
