2010 Holden Caprice vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 179 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3.

Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (228 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: