2010 Holden Colorado vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Colorado | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | Colorado | Colt |
Year Released | 2010 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 112 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |