2010 Holden Colorado vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Colorado | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | Colorado | Colt |
Year Released | 2010 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 102 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |