2010 Holden Commodore vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2002 Acura CL. (260 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura CL.

Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 2002 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: