2010 Holden Epica vs. 2012 Ford Escape
To start off, 2012 Ford Escape is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Escape (171 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Escape. (232 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Epica | 2012 Ford Escape | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Epica | Escape |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 232 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2619 mm |