2010 Holden Epica vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden Epica | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Epica | Epica |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
