2010 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden UTE would be higher. Both 2010 Holden UTE and 2012 Holden UTE are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Holden UTE | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | UTE | UTE |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
