2010 Honda Jazz vs. 1992 Holden Apollo

To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 157 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz. 1992 Holden Apollo has automatic transmission and 2010 Honda Jazz has manual transmission. 2010 Honda Jazz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Holden Apollo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: