2010 Kia Cadenza vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cadenza. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 5 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Kia Cadenza | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Kia | Acura |
| Model | Cadenza | CL |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 260 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 2580 mm |
