2010 Kia Cadenza vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Kia Cadenza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Kia Cadenza would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia Optima (270 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cadenza. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 37 kg more than 2013 Kia Optima.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Kia Cadenza | 2013 Kia Optima | |
| Make | Kia | Kia |
| Model | Cadenza | Optima |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1538 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 4845 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 2795 mm |
