2010 Lada Kalina vs. 2011 Lada Kalina
To start off, 2011 Lada Kalina is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Lada Kalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Lada Kalina would be higher. Both 2010 Lada Kalina and 2011 Lada Kalina are equipped with a 1,595 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 58 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 120 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Lada Kalina | 2011 Lada Kalina | |
Make | Lada | Lada |
Model | Kalina | Kalina |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |