2010 Lexus HS vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Lexus HS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Lexus HS would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Lexus HS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus HS (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus HS should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus HS weights approximately 370 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Lexus HS | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lexus | Mazda |
Model | HS | 3 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | CVT | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4694 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1506 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |