2010 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 4000.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (226 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda 6 | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | 6 | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1839 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2789 mm | 2550 mm |
