2010 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (605 HP) has 245 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (1,000 Nm) has 710 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | SL | Commodore |
Year Released | 2010 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 605 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 1000 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |