2010 Mercury Mariner vs. 2011 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2011 Mercury Milan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mercury Mariner would be higher. Both 2010 Mercury Mariner and 2011 Mercury Milan are equipped with a 2,500 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercury Milan weights approximately 27 kg more than 2010 Mercury Mariner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mercury Mariner | 2011 Mercury Milan | |
| Make | Mercury | Mercury |
| Model | Mariner | Milan |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | CVT | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1664 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4801 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.9 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |
