2010 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2010 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Colt | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1500 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3640 mm | 4690 mm |
