2010 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 265 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2010 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mitsubishi Colt | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Matrix |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3640 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1695 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.5 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.5 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |