2010 Nissan Pixo vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan Pixo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan Pixo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Nissan Pixo | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Nissan | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Pixo | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 166 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2670 mm |
