2010 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Nissan X-Trail | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | X-Trail | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1839 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
