2010 Smart ForTwo vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2010 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 590 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Smart ForTwo | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Smart | Ford |
Model | ForTwo | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2010 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1000 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2695 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1542 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1867 mm | 3030 mm |