2011 Aston Martin Cygnet vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (150 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Suzuki |
| Model | Cygnet | Equator |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
