2011 Ford Ka vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ka. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Ford Ka | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ka | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 159 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |