2011 Holden Colorado vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Holden Colorado | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | Colorado | Colt |
Year Released | 2011 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 112 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |