2011 Mercury Milan vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mercury Milan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mercury Milan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 68 kg more than 2011 Mercury Milan.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mercury Milan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Mercury Milan | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Milan | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | CVT | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4801 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1834 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1445 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2728 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |