2011 Peugeot RCZ vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2011 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2011 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Peugeot RCZ | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Peugeot | Toyota |
Model | RCZ | Tundra |
Year Released | 2011 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4287 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1845 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1359 mm | 1800 mm |