2012 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Bitter SC
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1983 Bitter SC. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Bitter SC.
Because 1983 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A6 | 1983 Bitter SC | |
Make | Audi | Bitter |
Model | A6 | SC |
Year Released | 2012 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2800 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 177 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |