2012 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Lynx would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2004 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 638 kg more than 2004 Ford Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Lynx. 2004 Ford Lynx has automatic transmission and 2012 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2012 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Lynx will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Ford Lynx | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 302 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1748 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4877 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1473 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |
