2012 Chevrolet Express vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Express is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Express (260 HP) has 166 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Express is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Chevrolet Express. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Chevrolet Express has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Express will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Chevrolet Express | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Express | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5692 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2012 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2070 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3429 mm | 2490 mm |