2012 Ford Galaxy vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Ford Galaxy is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Ford Galaxy. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Galaxy.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Galaxy. (203 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Galaxy.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Ford Galaxy | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Galaxy | Epica |
Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2293 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |