2012 Holden Caprice vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2012 Holden Caprice. (278 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Caprice.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Holden Caprice | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | Caprice | XTS |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 278 HP | 314 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
